College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Locker: Leach, off-field issues become trending topics

By Landry Locker

Sports Columnist

|

Published: Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, September 29, 2009

The start of the season for this year’s Texas Tech football team couldn’t be any more different than last year’s historic start and the problems start with Mike Leach.

Following last year’s 11-win season, Leach’s public contract disputes took center stage and gained all of the national media attention.

Four games into the season, the Red Raiders already have matched last year’s loss total and this season has its fair share of off-field drama — with Leach in the middle of it all once again.

The off-field drama led to the suspension of a team captain and the ban of Twitter usage by Tech players.

Leach has been called one of the elite coaches in the country, especially by the local media, but the recent dramatic events with the Tech football program don’t resemble events that occur under an elite head coach.

I have never heard players publicly question Urban Meyer, Nick Saban, Pete Carroll or Les Miles after losses, and if they did, those conflicts stayed in the locker room.

It is very strange that a well-respected, emotional leader like Brandon Carter — who was selected as a team captain before the season — would suddenly be suspended indefinitely.

Even stranger is the report that starting linebacker Marlon Williams, the most vocal supporter of Leach during his contract disputes last spring, voiced his frustration on his Twitter feed Sunday following the loss to Houston.

Williams asked on his Twitter account Sunday why he was in a team meeting while the head coach had not yet shown up.

At Monday’s press conference Leach spoke out against the networking site calling it “stupid,” and saying he didn’t want to sit with a bunch of “narcissists” that enjoy typing about themselves all the time.

It is beyond hypocritical that the same guy who can be seen on TV giving dating advice and soaking up all the attention that the pirate persona brings him — most recently by gracing the cover of Texas Monthly with a pirate patch on his eye, is calling college students egotistical for using one of the most popular networking tools in the country.

I didn’t hear Leach calling Williams a narcissist when he was holding up signs and leading chants in front of the athletic office during Leach’s contract dispute.

And when did Carter, a beloved team captain, become someone that couldn’t even be around the team that selected him as a captain?

Have the players changed, or has Leach himself changed?

The 29-28 loss at Houston on Saturday should come as a surprise to nobody, especially Leach’s decision to go for a touchdown on fourth down from the 1-yard line rather than kick a field goal that would have put the Red Raiders up eight points.

Leach has been making questionable decisions on fourth down since he arrived in Lubbock 10 years ago; the events on Saturday night were just a reflection of Leach’s unorthodox coaching style.

In Tech’s 2003 loss at North Carolina State, the Red Raiders were 2-for-7 on fourth down conversions, and in Tech’s 2006 loss at TCU, Leach went for it on fourth down three times, converting zero of those attempts.

Failing on fourth down in road games and losing games to less-talented teams is nothing new for Leach, but it has always been overshadowed by his ability to pull of an exciting upset at Jones AT&T Stadium.

Nothing has changed about Leach’s coaching style, but since the Tech program began getting national recognition it seems like the drama within the program has increased significantly.

In sports it is easy for fans to become prisoners of the moment.

During Leach’s contract disputes in the spring, a lot of people on campus and around Lubbock, gave false impressions that the Tech program would plummet if the beloved pirate ever left Lubbock. But so far this year, the beloved pirate has lost control.

Maybe Tech Athletic Director Gerald Myers, a supporter of Tech athletics for decades, knew something that the rest of the Tech faithful didn’t.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Sailfish
Fri Oct 9 2009 12:48
Can Gerald Myers, Texas Tech, replace Leach with a coach that will win football games like Leach has??? Probability is not good.

Leach has demonstrated that one’s choices will make you or brake you if those choices have negative results. He really hasn't changed like many of you think he has, the public is only expecting more out of him and we’re not getting what we deserve.

I, like many, are cursed with the desire for Tech to be respected nationally by the powers that determine the caliber of one's team. But, it's not going to happen! PERIOD. Those powers do not want a small West Texas town with an up and coming major University with out the mainstream alumni to decrease their School’s publicity. It takes away from the "$" that is channeled to them and their Schools. As long as Leach continues to make bonehead decisions then the probability of mainstream respect is low.

That in mind lets turn our attention to Leach and the players. Is Leach teaching them to gamble at opportunity or are they being taught to make an educated decision to greatly increase their chances at success. Leach has always been a gambler with Tech Football and continues to gamble 4th down after 4th down or with on-side kicks until he finally makes a 1st down or recovers an onside kick. Probability is not good for either and his lose record in big games supports it. However, I don't know if he was a gambler before he came to Tech and has implemented his disease in his game time decisions or if he just become one while there in effort to spark "W's" for a then poor football program. Really it all doesn't matter today, he has a good program now and needs to abandon his gambling on the field and make educated decisions with higher probability that yields positive results. All the other coaches know he is a gambler on the field and expect it. He may have needed it in the beginning, but he doesn't need it anymore!!! LEACH, take the "W's" by probability and then use the element of surprise to gamble on “1” play in a big game to change or maintain momentum.

There is plenty of season left and Leach's program can continue to grow if he just stops “gambling” on the field. Get on track and don’t look back Leach! Continue running your offense the way you do and improving your defense, you’re an educated man. Start making EDUCATED DECISIONS!!! Don’t gamble.

And by the way, Pott’s is a better back-up than he is a starter. Keep it that way…

dust pan
Wed Sep 30 2009 22:33
Kudos to Landry Locker!!! It seems that the only media types who are willing to take on the PieRat for his arrogance and folly are the TTU school daily. The local print and electronic are merely stooges for the TTU athletic dept. I am a TTU grad and frankly disgusted with the Administration for allowing this clown to continue to degrade and embarrass the school.
Jef
Wed Sep 30 2009 20:33
Well Leach has gotten us to a point where we are an elite program. Now perhaps we need an elite coach to consistently keep us at this level and yeah Urban Meyer, Nick Saban and Pete Carroll are the type of people. Tommy Tuberville also comes to mind and I think he is jobless now. But if we have to replace Leach with Briles, Sonny Dykes or some guys from Houston and SMU, then I am much better off with Leach, because these guys are no elite either, infact they aren't even close.
Brian
Wed Sep 30 2009 15:58
People need to stop freaking out. We have lost two games, and we have a chance to still have a respectable season. The bowl streak will continue this year.....just need to get everybody thinking positive again.

I, by the way, don't buy into the idea that we lost the game just because of the 4th down try....there were a number of other things that could have changed the game. The first TD by Houston for instance. I didn't think it was a TD. We got some lucky breaks, too. Like the pick Potts threw that was negated by a terrible call.

JM
Wed Sep 30 2009 15:24
The mere fact that Texas students are posting on this story is telling.

What's also telling is that we came very close to beating the number 2 team in the country, in Austin, and that we were barely beat by our same offense at the number 17 team's home field.

Leach has put us on the national stage. He's indirectly put Houston on the national stage. So, now that we're on the national stage, can't we all just get along and stop pulling our pants down.

Next time you twitter your frustration (or write a one-sided, op-ed article), consider that ESPN, The New York Times, and Lance Armstrong are all listening and waiting to RT your whining. Sheesh.

Wreck-em!...not yourself.

Drewfurd
Wed Sep 30 2009 15:16
Quit complaining about Leach and wasting your breath. Tech is never going to be a powerhouse or dominate season after season. Be happy with what you have..
Roll Tide!!!
George Gant
Wed Sep 30 2009 14:18
Judging from some of the nasty responses to my comments, football in West Texas really is a Religious Experience. Point out some FAUX Pas on the part of the Coach and one can expect to be Burned at the Stake for Blasphemy... or Quartered and Drawn, if the Church allowed.
David from Austin
Wed Sep 30 2009 13:30
I'm a Texas student, and I think Mike Leach, despite being an oddball, is a good guy and a good coach, but he's in no way, shape or form an offensive genius, as the last commenter dubbed him. Bob Stoops easily shut down his spread last season. Texas' loss was mostly due to inexperience in the backfield. Oklahoma State, as it has already demonstrated this season, hardly has a decent defense, negating the idea that Leach's ability to put big points on the board against the Cowboys last year is any remarkable feat. Again, he's a good coach, but I've noticed that Tech recruits were changing commitments to schools like Baylor over the summer and that, when the rubber meets the road, Tech chokes about as bad as Oklahoma does.
CK
Wed Sep 30 2009 12:40
George Gant is a moron! So is the moronic reporter that wrote the article. Leach runs a very high powered offense. The only problems I have with Leach is he doesn't seem to place enough emphasis on defense. But on the offensive side of the ball the man is a genius. Obviously these 2 fools never played the game but want to comment about something they know nothing about. Stick your heads back in the bucket of sand because no one wants to hear from you!
Can't believe I'm standing up for Leach
Wed Sep 30 2009 12:12
George Gant:

Tech dominated statistically...against Texas?

Tech did have more yards and more first downs, but they had -6 rushing. It's tough to win when you can't run the ball - at all. They also had three turnovers and over 110 yards in penalties.

They played a great game, especially on defense, and had a chance to win.

I wouldn't say they dominated. Leach is a good coach, a weirdo, and kind of a jacka$$, but a good coach.

non-tt journalist
Wed Sep 30 2009 12:04
Guns up:

"Too bad you're just a lowly student reporter..."

Unconscionable line there, moron. Calm down. The kid is a writer for your university's paper. Don't trash the entire little-paid, student newspaper staff when they don't share your opinions. Also, how can a student at Tech be biased against his own football coach? Did I miss something? Is he freelance student writer from A&M? Do you know what bias is, or are you just regurgitating them term from Fox News?

Guns up
Wed Sep 30 2009 11:46
Landry, I'm sure uncle art is proud of you trying to oust mike leach. Too bad you're just a lowly student reporter with obvious bias. I'm guessing of the 15 people that read your articles most have enjoyed what leach has brought tech, a good football team. Anyone that disagrees is blowing two close road losses to ranked teams way out of proportion.
Robert
Wed Sep 30 2009 11:24
Two losses and some hurt feelings and immediately out come the Leach conspiracy crowd which has been active since is first year. Good grief.
George Gant
Wed Sep 30 2009 00:52
The administrations at UCLA and Washington Universities seemed to know that something was wrong , as the alumni were rooting for Leach to take the job at each, but the administrations passed. Money was mentioned as an issue, but the alumni were willing to find the means.

As a UCLA alum I followed the blogs concerning the selection of the new UCLA Coach very closely. Rumor had it that Leach wanted the job very badly, and the alumni were quite upset with the unyielding opposition from the school administration for not willing to consider a winning offer. As of today, the previously losing UCLA Bruins are 3-0.

Leach's talent and creativity is not in question, but some of his actions and especially certain calls on the field even stun a junior high school coach, leaving a big question mark in ones mind. Why risk losing the initiative on a play that would probably give you nothing in return......when you don't even need the risk? To quote Coach Bob Knight, "The Basketball team that makes the fewest mistakes usually wins." That applies to football and other sports as well.

How does one explain an onside kick in the middle of a game Tech dominated statistically, while holding the #2 team in the nation literally bottled up, thereby effectively handing Texas the ball in the middle of the field instead of its own 10-20 yard line? Tech's momentum was destroyed and Texas was both energized and ready to take advantage of the short distance to the goal line for a couple of scores.

What was the purpose of that onside kick? The probability of Tech regaining the ball and taking it back to score was practically nil. This is a desperation play when a losing team is out of time at the end of the game and has nothing else to lose, "hoping" to recover the ball and possibly score. The opposite probability was quite obvious, as Texas regained the momentum and put away the game that Tech could have won.

The refusal to kick a "gimme" field goal for an eight (8) point lead in the Houston game speaks for itself. Exactly what was Leach trying to prove on that series of hopeless plays? What's the probability that Houston could have answered with eight (8) points? The most probable scenario was a Tech win. The worst case scenario would have been OT.

Well, folks. All is not lost. Just Google "Texas Tech News' or "Coach Leach," and you will find an abundance of stories from across the nation. If there is one thing Coach Leach does better than no other, it is getting free and abundant publicity for Texas Tech. The question now, however, is whether this type of publicity will enhance the next recruiting effort. At this point I'm willing to vote negative on that one.

Something is terribly wrong in Raiderland, and someone needs to find out the cause. It's only a football game some would tell you, but football is one EXPENSIVE game, especially for quirky experimentation. How long will the alumni support this?







log out