Quantcast Daily Toreador
College Media Network

Study finds many sunscreens ineffective, hazardous to health

Bridget De Stefano

Issue date: 7/22/08 Section: La Vida
  • Print
  • Email
Media Credit: Ruben Castillo

Not to rub it in, but some sunscreens just don't work.

A recent study conducted by a non-profit environmental watchdog organization, Environmental Working Group, found four out of five name-brand sunscreens either do not protect as advertised or contain harmful ingredients.

The experiment tested each sunscreen to determine its overall effectiveness in three categories: UVA protection, UVB protection and the stability of the active ingredients during their exposure to sunlight.

According to the report, 15 percent of the 952 sunblocks tested for the study met EWG health standards in these three areas.

The EWG requirements are based on data from industrial, government and academic sources that establish criteria for the safety levels of potentially toxic chemicals often found in sunscreen. The risk factors also were based on tested products' effective ultraviolet radiation protection and their associated chemical stability.

According to the report, the FDA has set no mandatory standard for any of these categories. Sunscreen manufacturers are not legally obligated to produce products that protect consumers from the sun or guarantee consumer safety.

Of the tested sunscreens with a sun protection factor of 30 or more, according to the report, 7 percent lack the ingredients necessary for UVA protection, or, in the case of many products tested, only protect from UVB.

Russell Akin, a dermatologist at the Texas Tech University Health SciencesCenter, said he recommends the use of sunscreens that protect from both UVA ­rays - the rays linked to aging and skin damage - and UVB rays, which are the rays linked to sunburns. Overexposure to both UVA and UVB rays contribute to the development of cancer.

"Number one: SPF is a rating for UVB rays only, which are involved in causing cancer, but more involved in burning," he said, but UVA rays, which also can cause cancer, are linked more closely to cosmetic damage of the skin known as "photo-aging."

The organization's analysis found 48 percent of products on the market contain chemical compounds that quickly break down in sunlight. This instability prevents the products from protecting skin from UV radiation as effectively as they claim.

Some commonly misleading claims on sunscreen labels, according to the report, include broad-spectrum protection, all-day protection, waterproof and chemical-free.
Page 1 of 3 next >

Article Tools

Disclaimer:

Opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of The Daily Toreador, the department of Student Media or Texas Tech University. Student editors have the authority to make all online content decisions without censorship or advance approval and are solely responsible for the content of this Web site. None of the opinions expressed on this page are previewed by any university official. Any postings, SPAM or otherwise, considered by the editorial staff to be campaign endorsements for political candidates other than opinions of users attached to articles pertaining to election issues will be deleted immediately.

View the online policy here.

To report questionable content, send an email to dtonlineeditor@gmail.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 4 of 4

George Schwarz

posted 7/21/08 @ 6:25 PM CST

No names? No brands? No links to Web sites? One interview with one dermatologist? And this passes for journalism?

I expect this kind of story in the Avalanche-Journal or, up here in Amarillo, the Globe-News. (Continued…)

Gert B. Frobe

posted 7/21/08 @ 10:47 PM CST

I thought this was an excellent and informative story, and I also happened to notice recommended brand names and several direct citations of an official study conducted by a prominent research group in addition to several candid and expert opinions throughout the body of the piece. (Continued…)

HV Bradley

posted 7/22/08 @ 11:39 AM CST

This is poor reporting. The third paragraph states there was an experiment. There was no experiment. See the original report.

This group did a literature review and developed their own "guidelines" with no rigor or rationale. (Continued…)

Bernie Stevenopolis

Bernie Stevenopolis

posted 7/23/08 @ 12:26 AM CST

I wore sunscreen when I was in college and, as you may know, I never got skin cancer. I attribute it to that. Thank you for the tips.

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What does your New Year's resolution pertain to?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement

Other news

Download PDF

Chit Chat